The specifics of method of consecutive projections in deconvolution problems

Authors

  • Iskander Sh. Latypov

Abstract

Method of consecutive projections (MCP) is quite popular. The principal idea of the method is to present the convex set as intersection of simple elementary convex sets and project to sets, outer for the current point. To build projection onto elementary sets very easy, because elementary sets are semispaces. It was proved, that this algorithm is finitely convergent. Each iteration of MCP has 3 tasks: 1. choose elementary set for projection; 2. define direction; 3. calculate length of step. Typical features of the method for deconvolution problems are the large dimension and the presence of a large number of almost perpendicular directions of projection. We found that several sequential steps in perpendicular directions can be replaced by one step, indicating a simple way to build it. Although the theoretical speed of convergence of the method remained the same, for large-scale problems (of the order of hundreds of millions), characteristic, for example, for image processing, it was possible to reduce the counting time by hundreds of times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Брэгман Л.М. Нахождение общей точки выпуклых множеств методом последовательного проектирования // ДАН СССР. 1965. Т.162, №3. С.487–490.

2. Фазылов В.Р. Один общий метод отыскания точки выпуклого множества//Изв.ВУЗов.Математика, 1983. №6. С.43–51.

3. Куликов А.Н., Фазылов В.Р. О регулировке заглубления в методе опорных векторов ссоставнымшагом//Исследования по прикладной математике.Казань:Изд-воКазан.ун-та,1992.Вып.18. С.79–87.

4. Юла Д. Математическая теория восстановления изображений методом выпуклых проекций//Вкн.:Реконструкция изображений/подред.Г.Старк.М.:Мир,1992.

5. Marks R.J. II Alternating Projections onto Convex Sets // In: Deconvolution of Images andSpectra / ed. P.A.Jensson. NY: Academic Press, 1997.

6. Еремин И.И., Попов Л.Д. Замкнутые фейеровские циклы для несовместных систем вы-пуклых неравенств // Изв. вузов. Матем. 2008. №1. С.11–19.

7. Schneider D., van Ekeris T., Jacobsmuehlen J., Gross S. On benchmarking non-blind decon-volution algorithms: a sample driven comparison of image de-blurring methods for automated visualinspection systems // In: Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2013IEEE International. 2013. P.1646–1651.

8. Тихонов А.Н., Арсенин В.Я. Методы решения некорректных задач. М.: Наука, 1979.

9. Горный В.И., Кислицкий М.И., Латыпов И.Ш. Оценка эффективности алгоритмов син-тезирования апертуры сканирующего радиометра // Современные проблемы дистанционного зон-дирования Земли из космоса. 2010. Т.7, №2. С.14–25.

Published

2020-08-17

How to Cite

Latypov, I. S. (2020). The specifics of method of consecutive projections in deconvolution problems. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Astronomy, 6(1), 81–87. Retrieved from https://math-mech-astr-journal.spbu.ru/article/view/8432

Issue

Section

Mathematics